SSSAJ Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Soil Sci Soc Am J 43:668-674 (1979)
© 1979 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Parker, J. C.
Right arrow Articles by Harris, W. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Parker, J. C.
Right arrow Articles by Harris, W. G.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Parker, J. C.
Right arrow Articles by Harris, W. G.

A Critical Evaluation of the Extension of Zero Point of Charge (ZPC) Theory to Soil Systems1

J. C. Parker, L. W. Zelazny, S. Sampath and W. G. Harris2

ABSTRACT

The points of zero salt effect (PZSE) of surface and subsurface horizons of soils ranging from an Hapludoll to a Paleudult were obtained from batch titrations in CaCl2 solutions with and without prior Ca saturation and in NaCl solutions following Na saturation. PZSE's of Na-saturated samples equilibrated for 1 hour were generally between pH 2 and 3, while those of Na- or Ca-saturated samples or unwashed samples equilibrated for 2 days were generally between 3 and 4. The effect of equilibration time was attributed to gradual sample decomposition accompanied by conversion of Na-saturated soil to an Al-Na-system.

Points of zero net charge (PZNC) were evaluated by measurement of Ca and Cl adsorption at various pH levels. No net charge reversal from negative to positive was found to occur above pH 2.0. This discrepancy between PZSE and PZNC was attributed to specific adsorption of cations, H+ exchange with counterions associated with permanent charge sites and other reactions of H+ or OH- which did not result in a change in surface charge. From 30–90% of the H+ or OH- lost from solution during titration did not create an equivalent change in surface charge. Exchange reactions and reaction of H+ with Al and Fe in various forms are implicated in this regard. It is suggested that the use of potentiometric titrations for the estimation of electrochemical properties of soils regarded with considerable caution.


NOTES

1 Contribution of the Department of Agronomy, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA 24061.

2 Research Associate, Associate Professor, and Research Associates, respectively.

Received for publication September 4, 1978. Accepted for publication February 21, 1979.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Environ. Qual.Home page
J. Koski-Vahala and H. Hartikainen
Assessment of the Risk of Phosphorus Loading Due to Resuspended Sediment
J. Environ. Qual., May 1, 2001; 30(3): 960 - 966.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of the Geological SocietyHome page
D. G. KINNIBURGH
Towards more detailed methods for quantifying the acid susceptibility of rocks and soils
Journal of the Geological Society, July 1, 1986; 143(4): 679 - 690.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1979 by the Soil Science Society of America.