SSSAJ Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Soil Sci Soc Am J 43:274-278 (1979)
© 1979 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rao, P. V.
Right arrow Articles by Hammond, L. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Rao, P. V.
Right arrow Articles by Hammond, L. C.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Rao, P. V.
Right arrow Articles by Hammond, L. C.

Use of Goodness-of-fit Tests for Characterizing the Spatial Variability of Soil Properties1

P. V. Rao, P. S. C. Rao, J. M. Davidson and L. C. Hammond2

ABSTRACT

Application of the empirical distribution function (EDF) statistics to describe the spatial variability of soil properties is discussed. The Kolmogorov statistic (D) and the Cramer-von Mises statistics (W2) were utilized to statistically evaluate the goodness-of-fit of a hypothesized theoretical distribution function to a sample of measurements of spatially-varying soil properties. Because normal and log-normal distributions have been commonly used to describe the variability of several soil properties, a Monte Carlo study was performed to determine the sample size required for selecting, with a prescribed level of confidence, between these two distributions. It was found that the required sample size increased with decreasing coefficient of variation (CV = standard deviation/mean). However, both normal and log-normal distributions may adequately describe a set of measurements with CV <= 0.4. In such cases, it was shown that accepting normal distribution as the appropriate distribution when the true distribution is, in fact, log-normal, would involve a maximum error of about 20% when the mean is used instead of the mode.


NOTES

1 Joint Contribution from Statistics Dept. and Soil Science Dept., Univ. of Florida. Florida Agric. Exp. Stn. J. Series no. 1316.

2 Professor, Statistics Dept.; Assistant Research Scientist, and Professors, Soil Science Dept., Univ. of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, respectively.

Received for publication July 26, 1978. Accepted for publication November 8, 1978.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Vadose Zone JHome page
M. S. Akhtar, M. S. Akhtar, T. S. Steenhuis, B. K. Richards, and M. B. McBride
Chloride and Lithium Transport in Large Arrays of Undisturbed Silt Loam and Sandy Loam Soil Columns
Vadose Zone J., November 1, 2003; 2(4): 715 - 727.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Vadose Zone Journal Journal of Plant Registrations
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Journal of
Environmental Quality
Copyright © 1979 by the Soil Science Society of America.