SSSAJ Grow Your Career with SSSA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Soil Sci Soc Am J 42:725-730 (1978)
© 1978 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow An erratum has been published
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mikkelsen, D. S.
Right arrow Articles by Obcemea, W. N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Mikkelsen, D. S.
Right arrow Articles by Obcemea, W. N.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Mikkelsen, D. S.
Right arrow Articles by Obcemea, W. N.

Ammonia Volatilization Losses from Flooded Rice Soils1

D. S. Mikkelsen, S. K. De Datta and W. N. Obcemea2

ABSTRACT

The pH of the flood water in rice fields is largely determined by the chemical equilibria that exist between the CO2 balance achieved by the aquatic biota and the various solutes, solids, and gases in the water. Water pH values undergo diurnal changes, increasing by midday to values as high as pH 9.5–10 and decreasing as much as 2–3 pH units during the night. The pH of shallow flood water is greatly affected by the total respiration activity of all the heterotrophic organisms and the gross photosynthesis of the species present.

Ammonium form fertilizers broadcast into a high pH water are highly susceptible to direct NH3 volatilization losses. Nitrogen losses from fertilizer broadcast into flood water on a fertile, neutral-pH Maahas clay were as high as 20% of the amount applied, but losses varied depending upon water pH, the nitrogen source, and rate, time, and method of application. Losses from an acid Luisiana clay, where the flood water was not conducive to algal growth and did not exceed pH 6.8, produced NH3 volatilization losses consistently less than 1% of the total N applied. Placement of N fertilizer in the soil at depths of 10–12 cm reduced NH3 volatilization losses to less than 1% of the total N applied.


NOTES

1 Contribution from the Dept. of Agron., The Int. Rice Res. Inst., Los Banos, Laguna (mail address: IRRI, P.O. Box 933, Manila, Philippines.)

2 Professor, Univ. of Calif. and formerly visiting Scientist; Head, Agron. Dep., and Research Assistant, respectively, The Int. Rice Res. Inst.

Received for publication January 13, 1978. Accepted for publication June 7, 1978.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Soil Sci.Home page
B. R. Griggs, R. J. Norman, C. E. Wilson Jr., and N. A. Slaton
Ammonia Volatilization and Nitrogen Uptake for Conventional and Conservation Tilled Dry-Seeded, Delayed-Flood Rice
Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., April 5, 2007; 71(3): 745 - 751.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Vadose Zone Journal Journal of Plant Registrations
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Journal of
Environmental Quality
Copyright © 1978 by the Soil Science Society of America.