SSSAJ Grow Your Career with SSSA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Soil Sci Soc Am J 40:480-484 (1976)
© 1976 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Beese, F.
Right arrow Articles by van der Ploeg, R. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Beese, F.
Right arrow Articles by van der Ploeg, R. R.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Beese, F.
Right arrow Articles by van der Ploeg, R. R.

Influence of Hysteresis on Moisture Flow in an Undisturbed Soil Monolith1

F. Beese and R. R. van der Ploeg2

ABSTRACT

The moisture dynamics of an undisturbed soil monolith were studied during a lysimeter experiment. Daily measurements were made of the soil suction at 10 depths. Also daily measured were the precipitation, the seepage, and the evaporation from the monolith during a 3-year period. For selected periods, a drying (desorption) curve and a wetting (sorption) curve of the soil moisture characteristic were determined from field data. Also the capillary conductivity was determined with use of daily monolith observations. With use of these hydraulic functions, the unsaturated soil moisture flow equation was solved numerically for one-dimensional vertical flow. In order to determine the effect of hysteresis on the suction distribution in the monolith, calculations were performed either with the desorption curve or with the sorption curve without scanning between these curves. Neither of the two curves leads to complete agreement between observed and calculated soil suction values; the desorption curve usually gives too high values, the sorption curve too low values.


NOTES

1 Contribution from the Inst. of Soil Science and Forest Nutrition, Georg-August Univ., 2 Buesgenweg, 34 Goettingen, West Germany.

2 Research Soil Scientists.

Received for publication November 10, 1975. Accepted for publication March 26, 1976.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1976 by the Soil Science Society of America.