SSSAJ Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Soil Sci Soc Am J 39:599-603 (1975)
© 1975 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Elzeftawy, A.
Right arrow Articles by Mansell, R. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Elzeftawy, A.
Right arrow Articles by Mansell, R. S.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Elzeftawy, A.
Right arrow Articles by Mansell, R. S.

Hydraulic Conductivity Calculations for Unsaturated Steady-State and Transient-State Flow in Sand1

Atef Elzeftawy and R. S. Mansell2

ABSTRACT

Using a method employed by Green and Corey (1971), hydraulic conductivity was calculated as a function of water content for Lakeland fine sand. A gamma ray transmission method for measuring soil water content and a tensiometer-pressure transducer arrangement for measuring soil water suction were also used to experimentally determine values of hydraulic conductivity for a similar range of soil water contents in undisturbed soil cores and hand-packed soil columns. Measured and calculated values were in good agreement for steady flow.

During transient flow soil water content was observed to be a non-unique function of suction for water desorption, but depended upon the state of flow. Higher water contents were found at a given pressure head during unsteady flow than during steady flow or static equilibrium (zero flow). Graphs of water content versus soil water suction were similar for cases of steady and no-flow conditions. For transient flow, the soil-water pressure depended upon the soil-water content and rate of change of pressure head with time.


NOTES

1 Contribution from Soil Science Department, University of Florida. Research supported in part by the US Department of the Interior as Florida Water Resources Res. Center Project A-026-FLA published as Paper no. 5591, Journal Series, Florida Exp. Sta.

2 Graduate Research Assistant and Associate Professor (Soil Physics), respectively, Soil Science Dep., Univ. of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, 32611. The senior author is now a Visiting Research Associate, Dep. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of Illinois, Urbana, Ill. 61801.

Received for publication September 27, 1974. Accepted for publication April 22, 1975.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1975 by the Soil Science Society of America.