SSSAJ Grow Your Career with SSSA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Soil Sci Soc Am J 37:732-738 (1973)
© 1973 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hock, A. G.
Right arrow Articles by Hall, G. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Hock, A. G.
Right arrow Articles by Hall, G. F.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Hock, A. G.
Right arrow Articles by Hall, G. F.

Loess Distribution on a Wisconsin-Age Till Plain in Southwestern Ohio1

A. G. Hock, L. P. Wilding and G. F. Hall2

ABSTRACT

Loess thickness, depth to carbonates, nature of loess-till contact, soil type, and surface elevation were observed at 15 m (or alternatively 30 m) intervals along 8.5 km of pipeline trench wall; similar observations were made at 4.6 m intervals in three 41 m by 41 m grid sites each containing 100 observation points. Over 800 observations were made. Data were statistically summarized according to soil drainage classes (landscape position) and glacio-physiographic regions. Loess blankets the landscape, but is usually thickest on poorly-drained landscape positions and, except for local pockets, thins or becomes absent on slopes > 5%. Local distribution of loess is highly variable over horizontal distances of 7.5 m or less and is directly related to the irregular microtopography of the underlying till surface. Construction of a loess isopachous map for this area was deemed impractical because of the large number of observations that would be required to estimate mean loess thickness classes within relatively narrow (limits (± 20%), even on relatively stable geomorphic areas. No source area(s) could be identified for these loess deposits based on loess thickness or particle-size parameters.


NOTES

1 Contribution from the Dep. of Agronomy, Ohio Agr. Res. and Dev. Center, State Project 103, Journal Paper no. 78:73 and Div. of Lands and Soil, Ohio Dep. of Natural Resour.; presented before Div. S-5, Soil Sci. Soc. of Amer., New York, August 19, 1971. Part of senior author's M.S. Thesis, Ohio State Univ.

2 Agronomist, Landmark Inc., Columbus, Ohio; Professor and Associate Professor of Agronomy, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, respectively.

Received for publication March 22, 1972. Accepted for publication June 22, 1973.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Vadose Zone Journal Journal of Plant Registrations
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Journal of
Environmental Quality
Copyright © 1973 by the Soil Science Society of America.