SSSAJ Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Soil Sci Soc Am J 35:884-887 (1971)
© 1971 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Richardson, E. M.
Right arrow Articles by Epstein, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Richardson, E. M.
Right arrow Articles by Epstein, E.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Richardson, E. M.
Right arrow Articles by Epstein, E.

Retention of Three Insecticides on Different Size Soil Particles Suspended in Water1

E. M. Richardson and E. Epstein2

ABSTRACT

Studies were made to determine the retention of DDT, endosulfan and methoxychlor on different sized soil particles. The two soils used were Marshall silt loam from Iowa and Caribou silt loam from Maine. A portion of each soil was treated with H2O2 to study the effect of organic matter on pesticide retention.

Retention of DDT and methoxychlor was highest in the clay fraction of both treated and untreated soils. In the untreated soils the greatest retention of the three insecticides was on the colloidal (<0.08 µ) and 0.08–0.5 µ fraction. Removing the organic matter from both soils reduced the retention on the <0.08 µ and 0.08–0.5 µ clay fractions.

The two soils reacted differently to the H2O2 treatment, although the three insecticides followed very similar trends within a soil. It appears that although organic matter contributes to the retention of the insecticides studied, other soil properties also are responsible for adsorption.


NOTES

1 Contribution from the Soil and Water Conserv. Res. Div., ARS, USDA, the Maine Agr. Exp. Sta., Dep. of Plant and Soil Sciences and the Water Resources Center, University of Maine, Orono 04473. This project is supported in part by funds provided by the US Dep. of Interior as authorized under the Water Resources Research Act of 1964, Public Law 88-379.

2 Former Research Assistant, University of Maine, now Pesticide Residue Analyst, Public Health Laboratory, Department of Health and Welfare, State House, Augusta, Maine; and Soil Scientist, USDA, respectively.

Received for publication December 17, 1970. Accepted for publication June 21, 1971.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Vadose Zone Journal Journal of Plant Registrations
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Journal of
Environmental Quality
Copyright © 1971 by the Soil Science Society of America.