SSSAJ Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Soil Sci Soc Am J 35:718-721 (1971)
© 1971 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Smith, S. J.
Right arrow Articles by Scott, A. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Smith, S. J.
Right arrow Articles by Scott, A. D.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Smith, S. J.
Right arrow Articles by Scott, A. D.

Interpretation of Curves Describing Soil Potassium Exchange1

S. J. Smith, M. Liu, L. J. Clark and A. D. Scott2

ABSTRACT

Curves describing the release of K from soil samples in NaTPB solutions depict a linear relationship between the amount of K replaced and the logarithm of the extraction period. Such curves are quite different from the diffusion-controlled curves observed with mica particles and have yet to be explained. Reports of a similar relationship being observed with soil organic N release that also obeyed a second-order reaction led to an unsuccessful application of second-order kinetics to the release of K from 16 soils. On the other hand, linear K-releases versus log t curves were obtained by combining K-release curves for mica particles of different size and by placing mixtures of mica particles in the same NaTPB solution. Therefore, a soil was fractionated, and the K-release curves for the individual size-fractions were determined. The curves for the soil fractions were nonlinear and more like mica curves, whereas various combinations of these curves yielded linear K-release versus log t relationships like those observed with soils. Thus, the curves for soil K-release merely represent the combined effects of various particle sizes in the soil and not a distinctive mode of release.


NOTES

1 Journal Paper no. J-6706 of the Iowa Agr. & Home Econ. Exp. Sta., Ames, Iowa. Project no. 1722. This work was supported in part by the US Atomic Energy Commission under contract AT(11-1)-1680.

2 Former Postdoctoral Associate (current address, US Soils Laboratory, Beltsville, Md.), Graduate Assistant, Former Research Associate (current address, IRI Research Institute Inc., a/c Corporacion Venezolana de Guayana, Venezuela), and Professor of Soils, respectively.

Received for publication January 26, 1971. Accepted for publication April 1, 1971.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Vadose Zone Journal Journal of Plant Registrations
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Journal of
Environmental Quality
Copyright © 1971 by the Soil Science Society of America.