SSSAJ Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Soil Sci Soc Am J 34:902-907 (1970)
© 1970 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fox, R. L.
Right arrow Articles by Kamprath, E. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Fox, R. L.
Right arrow Articles by Kamprath, E. J.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Fox, R. L.
Right arrow Articles by Kamprath, E. J.

Phosphate Sorption Isotherms for Evaluating the Phosphate Requirements of Soils1

R. L. Fox and E. J. Kamprath2

ABSTRACT

Phosphorus sorption isotherms were constructed for soils which varied in mineralogy, texture, and past history of phosphate fertilization. Equilibrating conditions were: 25C, 0.01M CaCl2, and 6 days. Effects of heavy phosphate fertilization of soils with high phosphate sorption capacities were evident in phosphate sorption isotherms 10 years later. The sorption curves were used as a basis for fertilizing soils in pots so that phosphate in soil solutions varied from about 0.01 to 1.8 ppm P. Millet (Pennesitum typhoides, var. Gahi-1), was grown for 4 weeks. Yields approached 95% maximum when phosphate in soil solutions was adjusted to 0.2 ppm. The phosphate concentrations at which near maximum yields were attained were little influenced by soil texture or past fertilizer treatments, but absolute yields of millet growing in the sandy Norfolk soil (low phosphate buffering capacity) was greatest if the soil had been previously phosphate fertilized.


NOTES

1 Joint contribution from the Dept. of Agronomy & Soil Sci., Univ. of Hawaii and Dept. of Soil Sci., North Carolina State Univ. Submitted with the approval of the Directors as Journal Series no. 1167, Hawaii Agr. Exp. Sta. and Paper no. 3113 of the Journal Series, North Carolina Agr. Exp. Sta. Presented before Div. S-2 and S-4, Soil Sci. Soc. Amer., Nov. 13, 1969, at Detroit, Mich.

2 Professors of Soil Science at the Univ. of Hawaii, Honolulu and North Carolina State Univ., Raleigh, respectively.

Received for publication February 20, 1970. Accepted for publication July 6, 1970.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Environ. Qual.Home page
E. M. D'Angelo, M. V. Vandiviere, W. O. Thom, and F. Sikora
Estimating Soil Phosphorus Requirements and Limits from Oxalate Extract Data
J. Environ. Qual., May 1, 2003; 32(3): 1082 - 1088.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Soil Sci.Home page
L. Celi, M. Presta, F. Ajmore-Marsan, and E. Barberis
Effects of pH and Electrolytes on Inositol Hexaphosphate Interaction with Goethite
Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., May 1, 2001; 65(3): 753 - 760.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Vadose Zone Journal Journal of Plant Registrations
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Journal of
Environmental Quality
Copyright © 1970 by the Soil Science Society of America.