SSSAJ Grow Your Career with SSSA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Soil Sci Soc Am J 34:473-478 (1970)
© 1970 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Losche, C. K.
Right arrow Articles by Davey, C. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Losche, C. K.
Right arrow Articles by Davey, C. B.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Losche, C. K.
Right arrow Articles by Davey, C. B.

Soils of Steeply Sloping Landscapes in the Southern Appalachian Mountains1

C. K. Losche, R. J. McCracken and C. B. Davey2

ABSTRACT

At two locations in the southern Appalachian Mountains, soils at two slope positions on north- and south-facing landscapes were described, sampled, and analyzed to determine the relative effect of slope aspect and position upon the differentiation of the parent rock into soil profiles. At the southwestern Virginia study area, the parent rocks are highly siliceous sandstone and siltstone, whereas, the parent rock in southwestern North Carolina is a granitic biotite gneiss.

Soils developed from the siliceous parent material were very similar in morphological, physical, chemical, and mineralogical properties irrespective of aspect and slope position. In contrast, there was a high degree of soil profile differentiation at the two slope positions and on the two aspects in North Carolina. In addition to differences in morphological and physical properties, there are distinct differences in the clay mineral suites on opposing aspects. Kaolin and the pedogenic 2:1–2:2 intergrade minerals are predominant in the soils of the north-facing landscapes, whereas, gibbsite is the major clay mineral in the soils of the south-facing landscape.


NOTES

1 Based on portions of a thesis submitted by the senior author as part of the requirements for the Ph.D. degree. Paper no. 2883 of the Journal Series of the North Carolina State University Agr. Exp. Sta. Raleigh, N. C. Acknowledgment is made of support from the National Science Foundation, Grant B-2496, for expenses incurred during the North Carolina field studies.

2 Research Soil Scientist, North Central Forest Exp. Sta., Carbondale, Ill. (formerly Graduate Assistant, North Carolina State Univ.); Professor of Soil Science; and Professor of Soil Science and Forestry, Dept. of Soil Science, North Carolina State Univ., Raleigh, N. C., respectively.

Received for publication May 8, 1969. Accepted for publication January 12, 1970.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1970 by the Soil Science Society of America.