SSSAJ Grow Your Career with SSSA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Soil Sci Soc Am J 34:3-8 (1970)
© 1970 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bresler, E.
Right arrow Articles by Kemper, W. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Bresler, E.
Right arrow Articles by Kemper, W. D.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Bresler, E.
Right arrow Articles by Kemper, W. D.

Soil Water Evaporation as Affected by Wetting Methods and Crust Formation1

E. Bresler and W. D. Kemper2

ABSTRACT

Laboratory studies showed that evaporation from soil columns which were wetted by flooding was 25–30% higher than soil wetted by rain and 30–40% higher than from soil to which NaCl was applied prior to wetting by simulated rain. About 25–35% more water evaporated from soil which was exposed to evaporation immediately following infiltration compared to soil which exposed to evaporation 4 days after infiltration ceased. The crust which was formed at the soil surface by the raindrop action and dispersion due to sodium ion caused the wetting rate to decrease from 23 cm/hour in the flooded treatment to 1.1 in the rain and 0.06 cm/hour in the rain on NaCl treatment. Higher water content profile and shallower wetting zone resulted when rates of wetting were faster, and caused the total water loss to be higher. The total water loss was also affected by the type of crust which formed at the soil surface. After from 1 to 4 hours of evaporation, the highest resistance to water flow was estimated in the region immediately below the crust. This high resistance region hastened the formation of a surface dry layer in the rain-wetted treatments which reduced evaporation.


NOTES

1 Contribution from the Dept. of Agronomy, Colorado State Univ., Ft. Collins and the Northern Plains Branch, Soil & Water Conservation Research Division, ARS, USDA, Fort Collins, Colo. Published with the approval of the Director of the Colorado Agr. Exp. Sta. as Scientific Series Paper no. 1399. This work was supported in part by the Department of Interior, Office of Water Resources Research, under P.L. 88-379.

2 Temporary Assistant Professor and Soil Scientist, USDA and Professor of Soil Science, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colo. The senior author is now at the Volcani Institute of Agricultural Research, Rehovot, Israel.

Received for publication March 10, 1969. Accepted for publication September 24, 1969.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Vadose Zone Journal Journal of Plant Registrations
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Journal of
Environmental Quality
Copyright © 1970 by the Soil Science Society of America.