SSSAJ Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Soil Sci Soc Am J 32:686-691 (1968)
© 1968 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Eck, H. V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Eck, H. V.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Eck, H. V.

Effect of Topsoil Removal on Nitrogen-Supplying Ability of Pullman Silty Clay Loam1

Harold V. Eck2

ABSTRACT

Under irrigation, removal of the surface 10, 20, 30, and 41 cm of soil decreased N yields 40.6, 47.5, 58.7, and 64.7%, respectively. Respective decreases under limited moisture were 20.0, 36.3, 53.9, and 62.4%. Total N in the surface 15 cm of soil and N yields were closely related.

Relationships among drymatter yields of grain sorghum (Sorghum vulgare), associated N uptake, and N treatments (soil NO3-N + fertilizer N) were used to estimate maximum yields attainable and to determine the internal N requirement of grain sorghum. That requirement was almost a constant (1.0%) despite the widely different yield maxima attained under the contrasting moisture regimes.

Under irrigation, similar yield potentials were attained on all except the treatment with the greatest topsoil removal (41 cm). Undefined factors, other than N, P, or water, reduced the yield potential on that treatment. Under limited moisture, fertilizer treatments did not restore drymatter yields on any depth of soil removal. Differences are attributed to differences in water storage and use.

Efficiency of uptake of available N was not directly affected by topsoil removal but was affected by the N status of the plants. It remained relatively constant until the plant N requirement was met, and then declined.


NOTES

1 Contribution from the Soil & Water Conservation Research Division, ARS, USDA, in cooperation with the Texas Agr. Exp. Sta.

2 Research Soil Scientist, USDA Southwestern Great Plains Research Center, Bushland, Texas.

Received for publication March 7, 1968. Accepted for publication May 17, 1968.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1968 by the Soil Science Society of America.