SSSAJ Grow Your Career with SSSA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Soil Sci Soc Am J 32:317-321 (1968)
© 1968 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by van Bavel, C. H. M.
Right arrow Articles by Stirk, G. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by van Bavel, C. H. M.
Right arrow Articles by Stirk, G. B.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by van Bavel, C. H. M.
Right arrow Articles by Stirk, G. B.

Hydraulic Properties of a Clay Loam Soil and the Field Measurement of Water Uptake by Roots: II. The Water Balance of the Root Zone1

C. H. M. van Bavel, K. J. Brust and G. B. Stirk2

ABSTRACT

Soil water depletion rates in a 115-cm and a 170-cm deep profile of Adelanto clay loam were compared with lysimetrically obtained consumptive use rates for periods of many days after measured water applications. When the soil was bare, the depletion rates were always higher than the rate of loss to the atmosphere, and the inferred flux at the 170-cm depth was as high as 2 mm/day 8 days after irrigation. When the test plot was planted to sorghum (Sorghum vulgare Pers.) an initially strong downward flux at the 170-cm depth reversed itself after about 10 days and became as high as 4 mm/day, representing upward flow of water from wet soil into the root zone above. The data imply that indiscriminate use of soil water depletion rates as representing consumptive use rates can be highly misleading at any time in an irrigation cycle. Further analysis shows that a rational and satisfactory correction of depletion data is not likely feasible, and, at any rate, unworkable for the condition of the experiment.


NOTES

1 Contribution from the Soil and Water Conservation Research Division, ARS, USDA.

2 Chief Physicist, Agricultural Engineer, and Visiting Scientist, respectively, U. S. Water Conservation Lab., Phoenix, Ariz. Permanent affiliation of third author: Division of Soils, CSIRO, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia. Present address of first author: Inst. of Life Science, Texas A & M Univ., College Station.

Received for publication May 12, 1967. Accepted for publication January 29, 1968.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Vadose Zone Journal Journal of Plant Registrations
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Journal of
Environmental Quality
Copyright © 1968 by the Soil Science Society of America.