SSSAJ Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Soil Sci Soc Am J 31:593-598 (1967)
© 1967 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hanks, R. J.
Right arrow Articles by Faikbourn, M. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Hanks, R. J.
Right arrow Articles by Faikbourn, M. L.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Hanks, R. J.
Right arrow Articles by Faikbourn, M. L.

Evaporation of Water From Soils As Influenced By Drying With Wind or Radiation1

R. J. Hanks, H. R. Gardner and M. L. Faikbourn2

ABSTRACT

The evaporation rate from three soils initially wet was made the same by adjusting the wind and radiation intensity. The wind treatment caused a temperature depression at the soil surface initially which nearly disappeared after about 5 days. The radiation treatment caused a temperature increase at the soil surface which increased with time. Soil water content profiles measured as a function of time showed the water content near the soil surface to be higher for the wind treatment than for the radiation treatment. The components of flow due to temperature and suction gradients for both liquid and vapor flow were estimated using the analysis of Philip and de Vries. This analysis indicated the cumulative downward vapor flow due to temperature gradients amounted to about 10% of the net upward flow in 40 days at the 5-cm depth for one soil for the radiation treatment. Computations of evaporation assuming isothermal conditions for soils initially wet to near saturation would probably estimate total evaporation within 10%, and probably be sufficiently accurate for many purposes.

Key Words: vapor flow • liquid flow • temperature • soil water flow


NOTES

1 Contribution from the Northern Plains Branch, Soil and Water Conservation Research Division, US Department of Agriculture.

2 Research Soil Scientists and Soil Scientist, respectively, US Department of Agriculture, Ft. Collins, Colo.

Received for publication February 2, 1967. Accepted for publication May 10, 1967.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Vadose Zone Journal Journal of Plant Registrations
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Journal of
Environmental Quality
Copyright © 1967 by the Soil Science Society of America.