SSSAJ Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Soil Sci Soc Am J 30:649-653 (1966)
© 1966 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Giordano, P. M.
Right arrow Articles by Mortvedt, J. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Giordano, P. M.
Right arrow Articles by Mortvedt, J. J.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Giordano, P. M.
Right arrow Articles by Mortvedt, J. J.

Zinc Availability for Corn as Related to Source and Concentration in Macronutrient Carriers1

P. M. Giordano and J. J. Mortvedt2

ABSTRACT

Zinc oxide, ZnSO4, and ZnS were tested as sources of Zn at rates of 1, 2, and 4 ppm Zn for two successive crops of corn (Zea mays) grown on Nolichucky sandy clay loam (pH 7.3). Each source was mixed throughout the soil as finely ground material, incorporated into granules of ammonium nitrate (AN) or ammonium polyphosphate (APP) by pressure granulation, and into granules of concentrated superphosphate (CSP) during the granulation stage of the manufacturing process. When mixed with the soil ZnO and ZnSO4 were more effective than when incorporated with a macronutrient carrier. Both ZnO and ZnSO4 were markedly superior to ZnS. Ammonium nitrate and APP were comparable carriers when ZnSO4 was the source, but APP was superior to AN when ZnO was used. A higher concentration of Zn in the CSP granules resulted in poorer response to this carrier. Zinc oxide was pressure granulated with CSP, AN, APP, or Nolichucky soil to contain 0.5, 2.0, or 8.0% Zn. Soil granules and CSP were applied at 1, 2, and 4 ppm Zn while AN and APP were applied at 2 ppm only. Forage yields and Zn uptake varied inversely with concentration of Zn in all carriers.


NOTES

1 Contribution from the Soils and Fertilizer Research Branch, Division of Agricultural Development, TVA, Muscle Shoals, Ala. Part of the paper was presented before Div. S-4, Soil Science Society of America, Nov. 2, 1965, at Columbus, Ohio.

2 Soil Chemists.

Received for publication March 7, 1966. Accepted for publication May 12, 1966.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1966 by the Soil Science Society of America.