SSSAJ Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Soil Sci Soc Am J 30:278-281 (1966)
© 1966 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Brown, M. A.
Right arrow Articles by Volk, G. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Brown, M. A.
Right arrow Articles by Volk, G. M.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Brown, M. A.
Right arrow Articles by Volk, G. M.

Evaluation of Ureaform Fertilizer Using Nitrogen-15-Labeled Materials in Sandy Soils1

M. A. Brown and G. M. Volk2

ABSTRACT

A quantitative account of labeled ureaform and ammonium nitrate fertilizer N was made in outdoor lysimeters, greenhouse pots, and laboratory incubation vessels. A major portion of the labeled fertilizer N applied to lysimeter and greenhouse pots was recovered by crops. A greater proportion of labeled ammonium nitrate N was recovered in the plants than labeled ureaform N. However, more labeled N was found in the soil after 1 year when ureaform was the source. As a result, there were no differences in total recovery of labeled N in plants plus soil between sources. Approximately half of the N in the ureaform used in these studies was in a state of availability approaching that of ammonium nitrate. Extended availability of ureaform N over ammonium nitrate N was only apparent at the high rate of ureaform application. Approximately 15 to 20% of the ureaform material remained apparently unchanged in the soil after 1 year.

Unaccounted for N is thought to have been lost as a gas after it entered the organic N complex of the soil, since similar total recoveries were obtained for ammonium, nitrate, and ureaform N. Under anaerobic conditions significant quantities of N were lost from soils incubated with ureaform as well as from soils incubated with ammonium nitrate.


NOTES

1 Florida Agricultural Experiment Stations Journal Series no. 2193. The work was supported in part by a grant from Allied Chemical Company.

2 Formerly graduate research assistant (now Research Chemist, Soils and Fertilizer Research Branch, Tennessee Valley Authority, Wilson Dam, Alabama), and Soils Chemist, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, respectively.

Received for publication September 10, 1965. Accepted for publication January 12, 1966.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1966 by the Soil Science Society of America.