SSSAJ Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Soil Sci Soc Am J 30:233-236 (1966)
© 1966 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dunphy, E. J.
Right arrow Articles by Howell, R. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Dunphy, E. J.
Right arrow Articles by Howell, R. W.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Dunphy, E. J.
Right arrow Articles by Howell, R. W.

Responses of Different Lines of Soybeans (Glycine max L. Merr.) to High Levels of Phosphorus and Potassium Fertility1

E. J. Dunphy, L. T. Kurtz and R. W. Howell2

ABSTRACT

Comparisons were made of the response to fertilizer of many varieties and Plant Introduction lines of soybeans in field experiments at different locations in Illinois over a 3-year period. At each experiment one-half the area within each replication received a large application of P and K and the other half remained untreated. Varieties and lines were then planted in random arrangements in each half of each replication. Yields of each variety and line were measured and observations of some morphological characteristics were made. Results were analyzed to learn whether the different soybeans responded differently to the high level of soil fertility.

Some varieties and lines do possess, to a greater degree than others, the ability to respond to high levels of fertility. Other varieties are insensitive to variations in fertility, and yield nearly as well at mediocre fertility levels as on highly fertilized soils. A majority of the lines and varieties tend to respond to a similar degree.

"Ability to respond" was usually exhibited consistently though different years. In a few instances varieties appeared to respond differently in different years but the year-variety interaction was never statistically significant in this study.

At one location, ratings of several morphological characteristics (e.g. standability) were made and the effect of fertilizer on these ratings was determined for each genotype. While correlation coefficients between pairs of those effects were low, several were statistically significant and suggested some interesting relationships. For example, varieties that responded more to fertilizer were usually the higher-yielding varieties. Increases in stem length tended to be associated with increased yield response. Varieties that exhibited the most severe potassium-deficiency symptoms were not usually the ones that gave the greatest yield response to fertilizer.


NOTES

1 Contribution from the Agronomy Department, University of Illinois, Urbana. Approved for publication by Director of Illinois Agr. Exp. Sta. Presented before Div. S-4 Soil Science Society of America, Nov. 19, 1964, at Kansas City, Mo. Work reported here was partially supported by funds provided to the Illinois Agr. Exp. Sta. cooperatively by the National Plant Food Institute, the National Soybean Processors Association, and some individual plant food companies. Publication no. 420 of the US Regional Soybean Laboratory, Urbana, Illinois.

2 Research Associate; Professor of Soil Fertility; and Plant Physiologist in Crops Res. Div., ARS-USDA; respectively.

Received for publication August 2, 1965. Accepted for publication October 27, 1965.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Vadose Zone Journal Journal of Plant Registrations
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Journal of
Environmental Quality
Copyright © 1966 by the Soil Science Society of America.