SSSAJ Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Soil Sci Soc Am J 29:489-494 (1965)
© 1965 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Whisler, F. D.
Right arrow Articles by Klute, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Whisler, F. D.
Right arrow Articles by Klute, A.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Whisler, F. D.
Right arrow Articles by Klute, A.

The Numerical Analysis of Infiltration, Considering Hysteresis, Into a Vertical Soil Column at Equilibrium Under Gravity1

F. D. Whisler and A. Klute2

ABSTRACT

A numerical solution of the flow equation for water in soil was obtained for a flow system consisting of a vertical column of soil which had been drained from saturation to equilibrium with a water table. A thin layer of ponded water was assumed to be applied to the top end of the column. This meant that each point in the column wetted up along a different scanning curve of the moisture characteristic curves. The solution of the equation depicts the time and depth distributions of water content and pressure head during the resulting infiltration. The results show that for soils that have water content-pressure head curves with regions of steep slopes, the wetting front advances as a steep, well-defined front. In those soils with more gently sloping water content-pressure head curves, the wetting front was more diffuse. If hysteresis was ignored, the position of the front at any one time was overestimated or underestimated—depending upon whether the drainage or wetting curve was used.


NOTES

1 Joint contribution of the Soil and Water Conservation Research Division, ARS, USDA, and the Illinois Agr. Exp. Sta., Urbana, Ill. This paper is based on the Ph.D. thesis of F. D. Whisler, University of Illinois, 1964. Presented before Div. S-1, Soil Science Society of America, Nov. 19, 1964, at Kansas City, Mo.

2 Soil Scientist (Research), USDA, and Professor of Soil Physics, University of Illinois, respectively.

Received for publication February 11, 1965. Accepted for publication April 13, 1965.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1965 by the Soil Science Society of America.