SSSAJ Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Soil Sci Soc Am J 29:454-458 (1965)
© 1965 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Powell, J. C.
Right arrow Articles by Springer, M. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Powell, J. C.
Right arrow Articles by Springer, M. E.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Powell, J. C.
Right arrow Articles by Springer, M. E.

Composition and Precision of Classification of Several Mapping Units of the Appling, Cecil, and Lloyd Series in Walton County, Georgia1

James C. Powell and M. E. Springer2

ABSTRACT

Soils of the Appling, Cecil, and Lloyd series comprise about 80% of Walton County, Ga., according to a medium-intensity soil survey completed in 1962. To study the composition and precision of classification of mapping units of these series, straight-line transects using the point-intercept method were made along diagonal lines across 16 randomly selected 160-acre blocks of land. The soil was checked every 33 paces along these transects on mapping units of the Appling, Cecil, and Lloyd series. Slope was mapped correctly at 91% of the 518 stops; texture of surface layer, 82%; erosion, 77%; soil series, 74%; soil type, 64%; and all of these, together, were correct at 59% of the stops. All but one of the 19 mapping units studied contain more than 15% of inclusions of other soils. The mapping, however, is highly reliable from the standpoint of grouping pedons that can be interpreted similarly. Only a small proportion of included soils would behave differently from the dominant soil in each mapping unit.


NOTES

1 Contribution from the Soil Conservation Service, USDA, and the University of Tenn. Presented before Div. S-5, Soil Science Society of America, at Kansas City, Mo., Nov. 15–19, 1964.

2 Assistant State Soil Scientist, Soil Conservation Service, USDA, Athens, Ga., and Associate Professor of Agronomy, University of Tenn., Knoxville, Tenn., respectively.

Received for publication November 23, 1964. Accepted for publication April 12, 1965.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1965 by the Soil Science Society of America.