SSSAJ Grow Your Career with SSSA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Soil Sci Soc Am J 27:277-280 (1963)
© 1963 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Keeney, D. R.
Right arrow Articles by Corey, R. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Keeney, D. R.
Right arrow Articles by Corey, R. B.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Keeney, D. R.
Right arrow Articles by Corey, R. B.

Factors Affecting the Lime Requirements of Wisconsin Soils1

D. R. Keeney and R. B. Corey2

ABSTRACT

Soil factors which have been reported to affect lime requirement were measured on 26 Wisconsin Soils, and the importance of these factors in predicting lime requirement was determined by use of linear and multiple regression. The lime requirement was taken as the amount of < 200-mesh dolomitic limestone necessary to raise the soil pH to 6.5 after 12 months of equilibration. Organic matter (% OM) was found to be significantly related to lime requirement (r = 0.620), and a function of a pH-organic matter interaction, (pH 6.5 – soil pH) x (% OM) also correlated well (r = 0.884). Clay content, ranging from 5 to 27%, did not appear to be an important factor in determining lime requirement. Exchangeable Al contents were too low in these soils to contribute significantly, and pH 4.8 NH4OAc-extractable Al did not appear to be an important factor. Lime requirement as indicated by the new buffer developed by Shoemaker, McLean, and Pratt was very highly correlated with lime requirement (r = 0.949), while the Woodruff buffer did not correlate as well (r = 0.818).


NOTES

1 Contribution from the Soils Department, University of Wisconsin, Madison. Published with permission of the Director of the Wisconsin Agr. Exp. Sta. This work was supported in part by a grant from the Wisconsin Processed Limestone Assoc. and the Wisconsin Aglime Producers Assoc.

2 Former Research Assistant (present address, Agronomy Department, Iowa State University, Ames), and Associate Professor of Soils, respectively.

Received for publication June 25, 1962. Accepted for publication August 28, 1962.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1963 by the Soil Science Society of America.