SSSAJ Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Soil Sci Soc Am J 26:535-541 (1962)
© 1962 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Harward, M. E.
Right arrow Articles by Evans, D. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Harward, M. E.
Right arrow Articles by Evans, D. D.
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Harward, M. E.
Right arrow Articles by Evans, D. D.

Effect of Iron Removal and Dispersion Methods on Clay Mineral Identification by X-Ray Diffraction1

M. E. Harward, A. A. Theisen and D. D. Evans2

ABSTRACT

The clay minerals identified in soil samples were found to be dependent on the pretreatment of samples for iron removal and dispersion. Treatments affected the characterization for chlorite, montmorillonite-type minerals, vermiculite, and intergrade components. Increases in the degree of expansion upon solvation and in degree of collapse upon K-saturation and heating were related to the severity of treatments used for dispersion. Iron removal treatments also increased the ease of expansion and collapse to 2:1 lattice clays. It was concluded that certain pretreatments tended to remove interlayered materials which were present in these samples.

The degree to which clay mineral interpretation was affected by methods of pretreatment was not the same for all soils. Samples of the Astoria soil exhibited the greatest differences in diffraction patterns as a result of dispersion and Fe removal treatments while the Aiken was the least affected. The Willamette was found to be intermediate. The evidence suggested that the Astoria samples contained interlayer materials (intergrade components) which were poorly crystallized and thus more labile and subject to removal. On the other hand, the interlayer material in the Aiken seemed to be better crystallized and more toward the chlorite end of the spectrum.

It has sometimes been assumed that the methods which permit the identification of the largest number of components with "clean-sharp" peaks are the ones which should be used in sample preparation. It is suggested that the objective should be to obtain methods which permit the identification and reflect the properties of clay minerals as they existed in situ.


NOTES

1 Contribution from Dept. of Soils, Oregon State University, Corvallis. Technical Paper No. 1496, Oregon Agr. Exp. Sta. Presented before Western Soil Science Society, June 16, 1960, Eugene, Ore.

2 Associate Professor; formerly Instructor, now Soil Mineralogist, Scott Lab., Nairobi, Kenya; and Associate Professor of Soils, respectively.

Received for publication January 18, 1962. Accepted for publication June 8, 1962.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Vadose Zone Journal Journal of Plant Registrations
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Journal of
Environmental Quality
Copyright © 1962 by the Soil Science Society of America.