SSSAJ Grow Your Career with SSSA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Soil Sci Soc Am J 26:463-466 (1962)
© 1962 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Allison, F. E.
Right arrow Articles by Murphy, R. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Allison, F. E.
Right arrow Articles by Murphy, R. M.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Allison, F. E.
Right arrow Articles by Murphy, R. M.

Comparative Rates of Decomposition in Soil of Wood and Bark Particles of Several Hardwood Species1

Franklin E. Allison and Raymond M. Murphy2

ABSTRACT

The decomposition rates of the finely-ground woods and barks of 9 species of hardwoods were determined in the laboratory at two nitrogen levels. Carbon dioxide was measured at frequent intervals during periods varying from 72 to 580 days. The following species were studied: black oak, white oak, red oak, post oak, hickory, red gum, yellow poplar, chestnut, and black walnut. During the first 60 days an average of 30.3% of the wood carbon was released as CO2 in the absence of fertilizer nitrogen, and 45.1% was released in its presence; the corresponding values for the barks were 22.4 and 24.5%. The variations in the rates of CO2 release from the woods were not great, but hickory and black walnut barks decomposed much slower than the other barks. The hardwoods were attacked much more readily than most of the softwoods used in an earlier study, and consequently more nitrogen was required by the microorganisms that decomposed them. There were no indications that any of these wood products was toxic to the decay organisms.


NOTES

1 Contribution from the U. S. Soils Laboratory, Soil and Water Conservation Research Division, ARS, USDA, Beltsville, Md.

2 Soil Scientists.

Received for publication December 4, 1961. Accepted for publication January 19, 1962.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Vadose Zone Journal Journal of Plant Registrations
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Journal of
Environmental Quality
Copyright © 1962 by the Soil Science Society of America.