SSSAJ Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Soil Sci Soc Am J 26:426-430 (1962)
© 1962 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Conaway, A. W.
Right arrow Articles by Strickling, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Conaway, A. W., Jr.
Right arrow Articles by Strickling, E.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Conaway, A. W.
Right arrow Articles by Strickling, E.

A Comparison of Selected Methods for Expressing Soil Aggregate Stability1

Andrew W. Conaway, Jr. and Edward Strickling2

ABSTRACT

Aggregate stability was determined on samples taken from plots under 10 cropping systems on a Beltsville silt loam and on samples taken from selected soil types in Maryland, North Carolina, South Dakota, Texas, and Wisconsin. Complete aggregate and mechanical analysis curves were determined on the 2.0- to 4.76-mm. fraction from each soil sample. The method of Bryant et al. (2) was also used to determine water stability of this fraction.

These data were used to calculate soil aggregate stability by 24 different methods. Duncan's multiple range test was used to determine the ability of each method to distinguish between changes in soil aggregate stability produced by the cropping systems.

In general, simple summation fractions of the water-stable soil aggregates distinguished well between cropping systems and were as sensitive as more time-consuming methods. It was found that changes in aggregate stability were reflected most by the 0.5- to 2.0-mm. aggregates.


NOTES

1 Based in part on a thesis submitted by the senior author in partial fulfillment of requirements for a M.S. degree at the University of Maryland. Maryland Agr. Exp. Sta. contribution No. 3314, Scientific Article A951. Supported in part by funds from Regional Research Project NE-11.

2 Formerly Graduate Assistant, Department of Agronomy, University of Maryland, and Associate Professor of Soils, respectively.

Received for publication December 6, 1961. Accepted for publication April 24, 1962.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Vadose Zone Journal Journal of Plant Registrations
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Journal of
Environmental Quality
Copyright © 1962 by the Soil Science Society of America.