SSSAJ Grow Your Career with SSSA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Soil Sci Soc Am J 25:193-196 (1961)
© 1961 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Allison, F. E.
Right arrow Articles by Klein, C. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Allison, F. E.
Right arrow Articles by Klein, C. J.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Allison, F. E.
Right arrow Articles by Klein, C. J.

Comparative Rates of Decomposition in Soil of Wood and Bark Particles of Several Softwood Species1

F. E. Allison and C. J. Klein2

ABSTRACT

The rates of decomposition of 10 kinds of finely-ground woods and the corresponding barks at two nitrogen levels were determined in the laboratory by measuring CO2 evolution over periods varying from 53 to 800 days. The following species were studied: California incense cedar, cypress, redwood, western larch, eastern hemlock, red fir, white fir, Douglas-fir, red cedar, and Engleman spruce. The woods and barks of all of these species were considerably more resistant to biological attack than is shortleaf pine sawdust. California incense cedar, cypress, redwood, eastern hemlock, and red cedar, were decomposed to the extent of < 7% during a 2-month period. The comparative resistance of woods and barks to decay varied for individual species but the average values for the 10 species were similar. Due to the slow rates of decomposition, the soil was able to furnish adequate available nitrogen for maximum rates of decomposition for all of the wood products, and supplemental nitrogen was not needed.


NOTES

1 Contribution from the Soil and Water Conservation Research Division, ARS, USDA, Beltsville, Md.

2 Soil Scientist and former Physical Science Aid, respectively.

Received for publication August 8, 1960. Accepted for publication September 20, 1960.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Vadose Zone Journal Journal of Plant Registrations
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Journal of
Environmental Quality
Copyright © 1961 by the Soil Science Society of America.