SSSAJ Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Soil Sci Soc Am J 24:364-366 (1960)
© 1960 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Stanberry, C. O.
Right arrow Articles by Crawford, N. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Stanberry, C. O.
Right arrow Articles by Crawford, N. R.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Stanberry, C. O.
Right arrow Articles by Crawford, N. R.

Comparison of Phosphate Sources for Alfalfa on a Calcareous Soil1

C. O. Stanberry, W. H. Fuller and N. R. Crawford2

ABSTRACT

An evaluation of phosphate sources for alfalfa production was made on P-deficient Superstition fine sand under arid conditions. Factors studied included particle sizes, and methods, rates, and frequencies of application. These factors were evaluated under field conditions in terms of (a) hay yields, (b) P composition of plants, (c) total P removed from the soil by the hay, and (d) estimated residual P in the soil over a 3-year cropping period using radiophosphorus techniques.

Supplemental P applications increased hay yields an average of 38%, P percentage 25%, P yield 66%, and A values or residual P, 126%.

A 3-year summary demonstrated consistently that dicalcium phosphate, if mixed thoroughly with Superstition soil, was at least as efficient as concentrated superphosphate in increasing alfalfa hay yields, P percentage of the hay, total P removed from the soil, and available residual P. The two particle sizes of dicalcium phosphate were equally effective for the 3-year period, but the finer, with greater surface area, appeared more efficient the first year.

The higher rate of application, 131 pounds P per acre, was 7 to 71% more effective than the 66-pound rate in increasing yield, P percentage, P yield, and A values. A single initial P application for the 3-year period was as effective as the same total amount applied annually. When applied properly, both particle sizes of dicalcium phosphate, the phosphoric acid, and concentrated superphosphate all appeared to be satisfactory phosphate sources.


NOTES

1 Joint contribution of the Soil and Water Conservation Research Division, ARS, USDA, and the Arizona Agr. Exp. Sta., Tucson. Published as Arizona Technical Paper No. 548.

2 Soil Scientist, Western Soil and Water Management Research Branch, SWCRD, ARS, USDA, and the Arizona Agr. Exp. Sta.; Head, Dept. of Agr. Chemistry and Soils; and Graduate Student, University of Arizona, Tucson, respectively.

Received for publication January 9, 1960. Accepted for publication May 9, 1960.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1960 by the Soil Science Society of America.