SSSAJ Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Soil Sci Soc Am J 20:303-306 (1956)
© 1956 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Richards, L. A.
Right arrow Articles by Ogata, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Richards, L. A.
Right arrow Articles by Ogata, G.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Richards, L. A.
Right arrow Articles by Ogata, G.

Materials for Retainer Plates and Their Use for Retentivity Measurements1

L. A. Richards and Gen Ogata2

ABSTRACT

The selection of ceramic materials suitable for use as sample retainer plates is discussed. Methods for measuring the permeability, air-bubbling pressure, and air-entry pressure of retainer plates are given. The transfer conductance between retainers and a ceramic suction control surface is satisfactory if the contacting surfaces are reasonably flat and clean. Several tests have consistently indicated, however, that better results are obtained if a capillary contact medium is used when ceramic retainer plates are used on cellulose membranes. The retentivity at high suctions for cores may be significantly different than for air-dried and fragmented soil. For example, the average 15-bar percentage for 7 cores of sandy loam soil was 5.96, whereas the average 15-bar percentage for the soil in these cores after air drying and fragmenting was 5.48, the difference being highly significant. Tests indicate that the water-release curves for cores of a fine sandy loam soil that were wetted in the field by flood irrigation are the same as when the same cores are wetted to zero suction in the laboratory.


NOTES

1 Contribution from the U. S. Salinity Laboratory, Soil and Water Conservation Research Branch, A.R.S., U.S.D.A., Riverside, Calif., in cooperation with the 17 Western States and the Territory of Hawaii.

2 Principal Soil Scientist and Assistant Soil Scientist, respectively.

Received for publication May 13, 1955.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Vadose Zone Journal Journal of Plant Registrations
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Journal of
Environmental Quality
Copyright © 1956 by the Soil Science Society of America.