SSSAJ Grow Your Career with SSSA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Soil Sci Soc Am J 19:492-496 (1955)
© 1955 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nelson, L. B.
Right arrow Articles by Uhland, R. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Nelson, L. B.
Right arrow Articles by Uhland, R. E.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Nelson, L. B.
Right arrow Articles by Uhland, R. E.

Factors that Influence Loss of Fall Applied Fertilizers and Their Probable Importance in Different Sections of the United States1

L. B. Nelson and R. E. Uhland2

ABSTRACT

The purpose of this paper is to attempt to reconcile observed differences in effectiveness of fall versus spring applied fertilizers between states, and to point out factors that influence loss of fall applied fertilizers and their probable importance in different parts of the United States. Particular emphasis is placed on nitrogen fertilizers.

Possibilities for leaching losses from fall applied fertilizers are evaluated from the standpoint of percolation of water from the soil in various areas and temperatures as they relate to conversion of ammonia-nitrogen in fertilizers to leachable nitrate forms. On this basis, it appears that leaching losses would be negligible in the plains states and parts of Minnesota and Iowa. Progressing eastward, leaching from most soils is likely to increase, and fall applied nitrogen becomes questionable. In the South, where high percolation and temperatures predominate, fall application appears inadvisable.

Possibilities for losses from fall application are also discussed from the standpoint of erosion losses, volatilization of nitrogen, and immobilization and reversion of nutrients.


NOTES

1 Paper presented at the Symposium on Seasonal Application of Fertilizers Div. IV-B, Soil Science Society of America, St. Paul, Minn., Nov. 11, 1954.

2 Head of Section and Soil Conservationist, respectively, of the Eastern Soil and Water Management Section, Soil and Water Conservation Research Branch, A.R.S., U.S.D.A., Beltsville, Md. The authors are indebted to G. W. Musgrave for supplying evapotranspiration data from the soil erosion stations.

Received for publication December 28, 1954.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Vadose Zone Journal Journal of Plant Registrations
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Journal of
Environmental Quality
Copyright © 1955 by the Soil Science Society of America.