SSSAJ Grow Your Career with SSSA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Soil Sci Soc Am J 16:163-167 (1952)
© 1952 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Storie, R. E.
Right arrow Articles by Wieslander, A. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Storie, R. E.
Right arrow Articles by Wieslander, A. E.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Storie, R. E.
Right arrow Articles by Wieslander, A. E.

Dominant Soils of the Redwood — Douglas-fir Region of California

R. Earl Storie and A. E. Wieslander1

ABSTRACT

More than three million acres of the upland area of the Redwood-Douglas-fir Region of California have been mapped and classified to obtain information for use in the management of forest, grazing, and watershed land, as well as basic data on the soils of this important area. In this survey the soils have been classified as to soil series and depth classes.

The dominant soil series are divided into six groups according to association with natural vegetation cover and productivity for timber and grass. Groups 1 and 2 are associated with conifer timber forests; groups 3 and 4 with grass and oak-grass types; and groups 5 and 6 with chaparral. Group 1, the best for timber, includes soils of podzolic character, represented by such series as the Hugo and Josephine; Group 2, those of alkaline character, represented by the Cornutt and Dubakella series; Group 3, the best for grass, those classed as prairie soils, generally treeless and associated with perennial grasses and represented by the Los Osos and Kneeland series; Group 4, those classed as noncalcic brown, associated with annual grasses and open stands of oak, and represented by the Laughlin series; Group 5, lithosols of low site quality for grass and represented by the Los Gatos series; and Group 6, lithosols of very low site quality for grass and represented by the Maymen and Henneke series.

Data from profiles typical of the six groups of soils are presented showing soil characteristics, vegetational cover, and ratings of suitability for timber and for grass. These data point out that timber does best on medium textured deep (more than 4 feet to bedrock), permeable, well-drained soils where the annual rainfall exceeds 40 inches; that grass, in contrast, does best on finer textured, less permeable, and less well-drained — although shallower soils (between 2 and 3 feet deep) — which are typically less acid or more basic with depth; and that chaparral can grow on very shallow soils (less than 1 foot deep).


NOTES

1 Department of Soils, University of California, Berkeley, Calif., and California Forest and Range Experiment Station, Berkeley, Calif., respectively. Paper presented before Section Va, Soil Science Society of America, State College, Pa., August 30, 1951.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1952 by the Soil Science Society of America.